Showing posts with label solutions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label solutions. Show all posts

Monday, August 07, 2006

Flaws, Suffering, and Buddhism (Part 3)



Review of previous parts: We've invoked several tenets of NLP to describe a basic structure of approach necessary to effect change. We've also introduced the idea of the Four Noble Truths to provide a sound basis for finding the source of our flaws, which cause us suffering.

Part 3:

Let's examine what this teaching tells us about our fictitious person's parental problems. First, our person has to come to accept that suffering exists. Acceptance is the first key. Worrying about the problem shows that our person has not accepted that the suffering he's experiencing with his parents just “is.” It exists. Period. Thinking about why this is happening to him is not acceptance. The situation just is as it is, right now, and that, in and of itself, is the jewel lotus of perfection. Thinking that there is something “inherently wrong” with him or his behavior is not acceptance. His behavior is as it is in the moment, and it is based on his past. It is not getting him the results he wants, hence his desire to try something new, but there is no inherent wrongness. Accept that things are as they are, with no judgment of inherent nature.

Second, our person must come to the understanding that his suffering has a cause. The situation is as it is because of his past experiences. It cannot be otherwise, because we learn our behaviors as we go through life: we learn how to act, how to think, how to speak. If his problem involves other people, like our fictitious person, then those people also learned how to act, how to think, how to speak, based on their pasts. Hence, their interaction is solely a result of all parties' past experiences. To believe otherwise is completely disempowering, not to mention illogical—but our egos, emotions, and pride are rarely logical. Accept that there is a cause to suffering.

Third, our person must come to know that if he removes the cause, the source, the effects (symptoms) will cease. We know by experience that all things that occur have causes. If I raise my arm, the initial cause is my motivation to do so. Then signals are passed through my nervous system to the appropriate muscles to physically move my arm. Nothing can happen without a cause. If the motivation does not exist to move my arm, my arm will not raise. If my brain is incapable of communicating with the muscles in my arm, then my arm will not raise. If we remove the cause, the effects will cease. This third step is very important in the process because it is a common belief among people that they cannot change, that they are the way they are, and that's it. This belief is very dangerous because it raises an artificial barrier to success. But as soon as we realize that we can always affect causes, and hence change their effects, we become capable of anything.

The fourth Noble Truth has two aspects important to our fictitious person. First, he might accept that suffering exists, that it has a cause, and that if he stops the cause, the suffering would end. But he might not believe that there is actually a means to eliminate the cause. This belief is self-fulfilling. An amazing thing happens, however, when he gains the realization that he can eliminate all causes—he becomes capable of doing so, and the results start rolling in! The second aspect of the fourth Truth important to our person is that it actually lays the path in front of him, the Eightfold Path. The skills developed through the practice of the Eightfold Path bestow the ability to analyze situations and objects deeply, to penetrate through the symptom to the deep underlying causes. Herein lies the key to successfully eliminating our flaws.

We all have flaws. Anger, greed, and delusion underlie nearly every unskillful behavior, and in order to root out how, in fact, these three poisons are specifically damaging our lives, causing us suffering, we first have to realize that if we continue doing what we've always done, we'll continue to get what we've always gotten. We then have to accept that the situation is as it is. No benefit comes from getting angry at the situation, at oneself, or at another for causing the problem. It just is. We live. Suffering exists. We then have to realize that a specific cause underlies our suffering, and that eliminating the cause will eliminate the suffering—and we CAN eliminate the cause. Finally, following the practices described in the Eightfold Path gives us the means to penetrate to the source of our suffering and eliminate it permanently.

This brings us to the end of this series. Next, I plan on embarking on a discussion of the Eightfold Path, via several sutra references as well as personal explanations.



Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Flaws, Suffering, and Buddhism (Part 2)


Review of the previous part: In order to deal with our flaws, which cause us suffering, we have to realize that we cannot just continue doing what we always do. That is karma, our habitual response. Instead, in order to effect change, we have to try something different. But we have to do so objectively, because otherwise we will fall right back into our habitual actions when our emotions reach a critical mass.

Now, on to Part 2.

There are two more problems here. First, what I've described is H.A.R.D. This is why karma (habitual response) has such a strong hold on us. Second, our example problem has a unique difficulty—it involves another person. We have no control whatsoever over the person with whom we're interacting. And by all means our fictitious person should expect that his parents will NOT easily change their responses; they are trapped in the same snare of habitual responses that we all are. Therefore, this adds a level of difficulty in analyzing the results of our changes. Our changes might be good, but there will be a “propagation delay” between the time we effect our change and the time at which a new result can be observed. If we deal with a problem that involves only our own response to the world (i.e. jealousy over another's success), the propagation delay will be negligible—we can see the results of changes in our approach very quickly.

The NLP tenets we've invoked above are like a “black box.” Our problem is the input into the black box, and within the black box, the problem is funneled into the following structure: regardless of the incoming problem's specifics, we endeavor to act objectively in the situation, objectively observe the results, and then change our actions if the results are not what we want (after accounting for propagation delay). However, our black box provides little help in telling us WHAT changes to make. We're not looking for a band-aid, we want a long-term solution. Many approaches exist to ensure that our solutions are at a deep enough level to be long-term. I'm going to approach this issue using the frame given to us by the Buddha.

In my post here, I compared the Buddha to a doctor. If we use that analogy, we want to ensure that we make our changes at the level of cause, not at the level of symptom. As I noted in that previous post, putting a band-aid on the symptom is fine for immediate results, but for a change to last, we must remove the cause of the problem. To accomplish that, let's use the Four Noble Truths, which tell us that (1) Suffering exists; (2) Suffering has a cause; (3) Suffering can be ended by removing the cause; and (4) There is a path that leads to the end of suffering—the Eightfold Path.

Tomorrow, I'll post part 3, where we'll apply the Four Noble Truths to our problem solving method.



Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Saturday, August 05, 2006

Flaws, Suffering, and Buddhism (Part 1)


Everybody has flaws, things they feel they need to correct or improve. However, how many times do we actually make progress toward our goals to correct or improve our flawed aspects? And how often do we keep seeing the flawed behavior unabated in ourselves after years of “effort?” In this essay, I am going to describe the nature of such problems and their solutions using a Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) frame, and then discuss effective versus ineffective processes from a Buddhist perspective. First, from the tenets of NLP:

“If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you've always got.”

We very often get stuck in our methods. Consider someone who has a difficult relationship with his parents. The problem often arises because, over his years of life, their interactions have become predictable. People continue interacting in the same way they've learned to do so—it's the way our brains operate, and the basis of karma (habitual response). However, it should then be of little surprise to see that the results of their interactions are the same. If nothing has changed in the general means by which they communicate, then the same results will occur.

Our fictitious person with parental relationship difficulties often gets frustrated, and understandably so! However, here is where another NLP principle becomes relevant: “There is no failure, only feedback.” This principle espouses an objective view of the situation. Think about it. When you're embroiled in such a difficult situation, it is very hard to view things objectively. However, if you really want to improve the situation, you really have no choice. If you stay “caught up” in the situation, then regardless of the control you attempt to exhibit, your emotions will eventually exceed your tipping point, and you'll fall back on habitual responses. Therefore, the only real means by which to change your response (and, hence, potentially receive a different result!), is to remain objective and do something different from “what you've always done.”

Stay tuned tomorrow for Part 2, where we continue the discussion from an NLP perspective, and begin the transition into a Buddhist analysis.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Sunday, June 18, 2006

On Complexity, by Dave Pollard


Dave Pollard has written up an excellent piece on how and why we, as people, seem to hate complexity and "solve" complex problems with simple solutions that are not really solutions at all. It is well worth the slightly long read.